Draft recommended disclosures: Disclosure Metrics Annexes
Disclosure Metrics Annexes
Metrics Annex 1: Dependency and impact disclosure metrics
The following metrics should be used to support Metrics and Targets B and Strategy A disclosures.
The TNFD is proposing a set of 10 core global indicators for disclosure, relating to dependencies and impacts on nature (Metrics and Targets B and Strategy A). These core global indicators and metrics are outlined in Table 1. They relate to impact drivers within ecosystems on which the organisation has an impact or dependency.
To demonstrate their alignment with global policy goals such as the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) and other international conventions and international policy commitments, the TNFD strongly encourages organisations to include disclosures against all of the core global indicators of relevance to their business model, sector(s), biome(s) and priority locations.
If organisations do not report against any of the core global indicators and metrics listed in Table 1, they should provide a short explanatory statement as to why they have not reported.
The following considerations should be made in relation to the dependency and impact metrics:
- They should be considered in conjunction with the disclosure guidance for recommended disclosure Metrics and Targets B, which also considers external trends, changes to the state of nature and ecosystem services, and contextual information regarding measurement techniques, limitations and assumptions.
- For each metric disclosed, organisations should state the measurement baseline and indicate the percentage change from the previous reporting period.
- It is best practice to disclose metrics separately for the organisation’s direct operations, upstream activities and downstream activities, and any financed activities in the case of financial institutions. Acknowledging that this may not be possible for all organisations at this time, organisations should disclose direct operations at a minimum, and upstream and downstream activities where relevant and to the extent possible. At this point, the TNFD particularly encourages reporting upstream activities, as well as direct impacts, for metrics focused on the use of natural commodities.
- Organisations should state the location the metric refers to, referring back to the priority location identified in recommended disclosure Strategy D where relevant. For impact drivers, organisations should ensure the metric enables report users to determine what the impact driver is (i.e. what type of pollutant has been emitted), how much impact has taken place (i.e. the volume of pollutant emitted) and where the impact is located, with reference to spatial data where possible.
This draft set of core indicators and metrics will be revised based on feedback on the v0.4 TNFD draft beta release and a final recommended set of core disclosure indicators for dependencies and impacts on nature will be included in v1.0 of the TNFD framework. Release in September 2023.
Overview of nature-related impacts and dependencies
The TNFD defines:
- Dependencies on nature as aspects of ecosystem services that an organisation or other actor relies on to function;
- Impacts on nature as changes in the state of nature, which may result in changes to the capacity of nature to provide social and economic functions; and
- Impact drivers as measurable quantities of a natural resource that are used as an input to production and measurable non-product outputs of a business that affect nature. They can be positive or negative and can be mapped to the IPBES drivers of nature change. The Taskforce has modified the descriptions of the five IPBES drivers of nature change to reflect both negative and positive changes as a result of an organisation’s interactions with nature.
The TNFD is considering adding another core global dependency and impact metric addressing plastic production and consumption (currently an additional metric). The Taskforce is seeking feedback on whether a metric relating to plastic should be added to the list of core global metrics and if so, what this metric should be, such that it provides decision-useful insight about plastic-related issues for the majority of companies.
Additional disclosure metrics for dependencies and impacts on nature
Organisations should consider reporting the following additional metrics if relevant to the sector and biome in which they operate. The list of additional metrics includes positive impacts on nature and impact drivers that are widespread but do not affect the majority of sectors, such as light and noise pollution and the introduction of invasive species. It also includes metrics for the state of nature (ecosystem condition and extent) and ecosystem services.
Additional ContentTable: TNFD additional disclosure metrics for dependencies and impacts on nature
Category | Metric No. | Additional metric |
---|---|---|
Driver of nature change: Land/ freshwater/ ocean-use change | A 1.0 | Extent of land/freshwater/ocean use changed that is sustainably managed by ecosystem type and business activity in the relevant time period (proportion of total, change from previous year) |
A 1.1 | Extent of land/freshwater/ocean voluntarily conserved or restored by ecosystem type in the relevant time period (absolute, change from previous year) | |
Driver of nature change: Pollution/ pollution removal | A 2.0 | Volume of pollutants removed from land, atmosphere, ocean and freshwater |
A 2.1 | Volume of plastic produced/consumed | |
Driver of nature change: Resource use/ replenishment | A 3.0 | Total water withdrawal and consumption (absolute, change from previous year) |
A 3.1 | Extent of area that the organisation controls and/or manages that is used for the production of natural commodities from land/ocean/freshwater (extent of area split into types, change from previous year) | |
A 3.2 | Quantity of high-risk commodities[1] sourced under a management or certification programme | |
A 3.3 | Volume of water loss mitigated and produced | |
A 3.4 | Quantity of wild species extracted from natural habitats for commercial purposes | |
Driver of nature change: Introduction of invasive species and other | A 4.0 | Number/extent of non-purposefully introduced species, varieties or strains in areas owned, operated, used or financed in priority areas (absolute, presence/absence and/or number removed, change year-on-year) |
A 4.1 | Light and noise pollution | |
Ecosystem condition and extent | A 5.0 | Quantitative measurement of change to ecosystem condition and extent in priority locations the organisation depends or impacts on – refer to additional guidance on ecosystem condition |
Ecosystem services | A 6.0 | For ecosystem services impacted, measurement on the change in the provision of the service |
A 6.1 | For ecosystem services depended on, measurement on the change in the provision of the service |
Footnotes
Users may refer to the Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) High Impact Commodity List (HICL).
Metrics Annex 2: Risk and opportunity disclosure metrics
The following metrics should be used to support Metrics and Targets A, Strategy A and Strategy B disclosures.
The TNFD Strategy recommended disclosures refer to nature-related risk and opportunities. The TNFD defines:
- Nature-related risks as potential threats posed to an organisation linked to their and wider society’s dependencies on nature and nature impacts; and
- Nature-related opportunities as activities that create positive outcomes for organisations and nature by creating positive impact on nature or mitigating negative impacts on nature.
TNFD’s categorisation of nature-related risks and opportunities is set out in the table below.
Additional ContentTNFD categories of nature-related risks and opportunities
Nature-related risk categories | Nature-related opportunity categories |
---|---|
Physical risk | Business performance |
Acute Chronic |
Resource efficiency Products and services Markets Capital flows and financing Reputational capital |
Transition risk | |
Policy and legal Market Reputation Technology |
|
Sustainability performance | |
Ecosystem protection, restoration and regeneration Sustainable use of natural resources |
The core disclosure metrics and additional disclosure metrics in the tables below will be revised, based on the v0.4 TNFD draft beta release, and a final recommended set of disclosure indicators and metrics for nature-related risk and opportunities will be included in the v1.0 TNFD Release in September 2023.
The TNFD strongly encourages organisations to include disclosures against all of the core global indicators. If organisations do not report against any of the indicators and metrics listed in Table 4, they should provide a short explanatory statement as to why they have not reported.
Additional ContentCore organisation-level risk and opportunity disclosure indicators
Category | Metric no. | Metric |
---|---|---|
Nature-related risks | C 5.0 | Proportion and total annual revenue exposed to: 1) physical risks and 2) transition risks. |
C 5.1 | Proportion and value of assets exposed to nature-related 1) physical risks and 2) transition risks. | |
C 5.2 | Proportion and value of assets/total annual revenue exposed to risks by risk ratings (for example, high, medium, low). | |
C 5.3 | Proportion and total annual revenue/value of assets with substantial dependence on ecosystem services or with a high impact on nature. | |
Nature-related opportunities | C 6.0 | Value of capital allocated to nature-related opportunities, by type of opportunity, with reference to a government or regulator green investment taxonomy. |
The tables below, which provide additional risk and opportunity indicators and metrics, are non-exhaustive and should be considered within the context of the most material risks and opportunities for the reporting organisation.
Additional ContentAdditional organisation-level risk and opportunity disclosure indicators
Category | Metric no. | Metric |
---|---|---|
Nature-related risks | A 7.0 | Financial value of nature-related risks |
A 7.1 | Value of write-offs and early retirements of assets due to nature-related risks. |
Additional risk and opportunity disclosure metrics categorised by type of risk/opportunity
Risk or opportunity category | Metric no. | Indicator |
---|---|---|
Physical risk | A 8.0 | Description and value of assets/total annual revenue dependent on area affected by physical risk |
A 8.1 | Number of locations/business lines/facilities exposed to physical risk | |
A 8.2 | Value of capital expenditure on infrastructure asset repair or replacement as a result of nature-related loss and damage | |
A 8.3 | Percentage increase in insurance costs due to nature-related loss and damage in the previous year | |
A 8.4 | Capital expenditure on adaption due to nature-related physical risks | |
A 8.5 | Costs associated with the relocation of operations and suppliers due to physical nature-related risks | |
Policy and legal risk | A 9.0 | Description and value of fines/penalties received in the year due to nature-related impacts |
A 9.1 | Description and value of clean-up costs due to nature-related impacts | |
A 9.2 | Description and costs related to loss of operating areas | |
A 9.3 | Description and value of litigation action taken against the organisation associated with nature-related issues | |
Market risk | A 10.0 | Description of exposure to/costs related to loss of market access |
A 10.1 | Description of exposure and costs related to raw material and natural resource price volatility | |
Reputational risk | A 11.0 | Exposure to increased operational costs/loss of revenue due to reputational risks |
Technological risk | A 12.0 | Expenditure on R&D for new and alternative technologies related to mitigation and adaptation of nature-related risks |
Resource efficiency opportunity | A 13.0 | Value of operational cost savings due to more efficient use of nature-related resources, such as adoption of circular economy practices |
Products and services opportunity | A 14.0 | Increase in revenue from new products and services producing demonstrable positive impacts on nature |
Markets opportunity | A 15.0 | Increase in market valuation due to positive nature-related performance/reduction in nature negative outcomes |
A 15.1 | Access to new sources of finance/capital due to improved nature performance | |
A 15.2 | Value of green finance instruments used, such as green bonds and sustainability-linked bonds | |
A 15.3 | Year-on-year change in ESG rating scores for previous 3 years | |
Reputational capital opportunity | A 16.0 | Change in revenue/brand value due to reputational impact of nature-related issues |
Metrics Annex 3: Response disclosure metrics
The following metrics should be used to support the Risk and Impact Management B disclosure.
The below list is non-exhaustive and each organisation should consider the most appropriate response metrics for its unique business model and reporting context. All suggested metrics in the table below are additional.
Additional ContentDisclosure metrics for responses to nature-related issues
Category of nature-related responses | Metric no. | Metrics |
---|---|---|
Changes to nature (dependency and impact): mitigation hierarchy steps | A 17.0 | Circular material use rate (%) |
A 17.1 | Proportion of sites producing nature action plans (%) | |
A 17.2 | Type, scope (activities, geographies) and prices applied for biodiversity and ecosystem-related pricing schemes | |
A 17.3 | Rate of reuse and recycling (%) | |
A 17.4 | Credible and transparent third-party certification: % and/or value of production, consumption and sourcing of raw materials, per certification type | |
A 17.5 | Production, consumption and sourcing of raw materials that is traceable (%) | |
A 17.6 | Suppliers committed to sustainable production (%) | |
A 17.7 | Restoration of negatively impacted ecosystems (investment and extent) split into ecosystem/biome type and split into (I):
|
|
A 17.8 | Value of operational/capital expenditure categorised into mitigation hierarchy actions (avoid, reduce, restore and regenerate, transform) (value and/or proportions) | |
A 17.9 | Extent, duration and monitoring frequency of ecosystem restoration projects | |
A 17.10 | Value of total investment in projects that avoid or reduce negative nature impacts or restore ecosystems where impacts cannot be avoided (value / proportion of projects) | |
A 17.11 | Value of investment in nature-based solutions by type | |
Voluntary conservation, restoration and regeneration | A 18.0 | Extent, duration and monitoring frequency of voluntary ecosystem restoration projects |
A 18.1 | Value of investment in and extent of additional conservation actions split into type of action and type of ecosystem/biome applied to | |
A 18.2 | Value of investment in nature-related community development programs intended to enhance positive impacts for Indigenous Peoples | |
Participation in voluntary and mandatory credit market schemes | A 19.0 | Voluntary credit market schemes: Value of total biodiversity offsets purchased and sold by type |
A 19.1 | Mandatory credit market schemes: Value of total biodiversity offsets purchased and sold by type | |
Capital allocation / investment | A 20.0 | Value of investment in nature-related interventions and solutions as defined in relevant government or regulator green investment taxonomy |
Metrics Annex 4: Disclosure metrics for the agriculture and food sector
Organisations in the agriculture and food sector should disclose the following metrics for recommended disclosures Metrics and Targets B and Strategy A. These are relevant to the following sub-sectors and industries, unless otherwise specified:
- Agricultural products;
- Meat, poultry and dairy;
- Processed food;
- Food retailers and distributors; and
- Restaurants.
The TNFD strongly encourages organisations to include disclosures against all of the core sector indicators of relevance to their business model, sector(s), biome(s) and priority locations. If organisations do not report against any of the core sector indicators and metrics listed in Table 1, they should provide a short explanatory statement as to why not.
The Taskforce welcomes feedback on both the number and content of the core sector metrics for the agriculture and food sector proposed here, to inform the final selection for the TNFD v1.0 release in September 2023.
Additional ContentCore and additional disclosure metrics for the agriculture and food sector
Metrics category | Sub-category | Cross-sector indicator | Metric no. | Core or additional | Metrics for agriculture and food sector | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Impact drivers | Climate change | Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions – refer to TCFD | SC 1.0 | Core | Scope 1, 2, 3 GHG gas emissions including from land use change and emissions of GHGs (including CO2, CH4, N2O) from animal production and/or crop production and sourcing | Adapted GRI13, 2022, GBF target 7 |
Impact drivers | Land/ freshwater/ ocean-use change | Extent of land/freshwater/ocean use change, by type of ecosystem[1] (before and after change) and business activity, for prioritised ecosystems | SC 2.0 | Core | Size of agriculture driven terrestrial natural ecosystem conversion in km2 since 2020* – at least primary forests, other naturally regenerating (second-growth) forests and freshwater natural ecosystems, linked to land owned, leased operated, financed or sourced from * Or other regional or sectoral cutoff dates |
GBF target 1 & target 2, SBTN draft targets for land 2023 |
Impact drivers | Pollution/ pollution removal | Total pollutants released to soil split by type | SC 3.0.0 | Core | Intensity of pesticides used by toxicity hazard level (either extremely hazardous, highly hazardous, moderately hazardous, slightly hazardous, or unlikely to present an acute hazard) against baseline. | Adapted from CDSB Biodiversity; GBF target 7; FAO; GRI13; SASB; WHO |
SC 3.0.1 | Core | Volume and intensity (as proportion of the total cropland area owned, leased managed or sourced from by the entity) of excess fertiliser (incl. manure and biosolids) released to soil, water and air by fertiliser nutrients (i.e. nitrogen-based (N), phosphate-based (P2O2) and potassium-based (K2O) and methods of application and if relevant by metals | Adapted from FAO, 2021, GBF target 7 | |||
Total amount of hazardous waste generated by type | SC 3.1 | Core | Total weight (tonnes) and percentage of food loss and/or waste by type of food along the relevant stages of the value chain in which the entity is involved and disaggregation of total food waste destination (e.g. landfill, composting, controlled combustion, refuse, land application, co-digestion) | Adapted from SASB: Food Retailers & Distributors, 2018; FAO, 2021; GBF target 16; UNEP, 2021, Food waste Index | ||
Volume of plastic produced/consumed | SC 3.2 | Core | Total weight of plastic packaging (primary, secondary and tertiary) used/sold for food products, and indicate the raw material content (% virgin fossil-fuel based, % virgin renewable, % post-industrial recycled, % post-consumer recycled, none), and indicate total weight of plastics which are commonly classified as problematic (PS, PVC, EPC, multilayer plastic packaging, undetectable carbon black) | Adapted from SASB Processed Foods, 2018; CDP W10.8; Global Plastic Commitment 2022, GBF target 16 | ||
Volume and concentrations of key pollutants in the wastewater discharged | SC 3.3 | Core | Concentration of key pollutants in the wastewater: nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus levels), pesticides, organic loading (including crop and livestock excreta), pathogens, metals, other and emerging pollutants (including antibiotics and other veterinary medicines) | GBF target 7, FAIRR Index, FAO 2017: Water pollutants from agriculture: global review | ||
Total non-GHG air pollutants by type | SC 3.4 | Core | Emissions of Nitrogen oxides (NOx), Sulfur oxides (SOx), Ammonia (NH3), Particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), Non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) | GRI13 2022, GBF target 7 & target 11 | ||
Impact drivers | Resource use/ replenishment | Quantity of high-risk natural commodities sourced from land/ocean/freshwater split into types (absolute and percentage of total, change from previous year) | SC 4.0.0 | Core | Percentage of agricultural products or animal feed produced or sourced from regions with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress | GBF target 11, SASB: Meat, Dairy, Poultry, 2028, FB-MP-440a.1 & SASB Processed Foods, 2018, FB-PF-440a.1 |
SC 4.0.1 | Core | Percentage of agricultural products on the HICL sourced that are certified to a third-party environmental and/or social standard, and percentages by standard | GBF target 11, SASB Agricultural products, FB-AG-430a.1 | |||
Impact drivers | Climate change | Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions – refer to TCFD | SA 1.0 | Additional | Gross global scope 1 emissions from refrigerants | SASB, 2018, Food retailers, FB-FR-110b.1 |
Land/freshwater/ocean use change | Extent of land/freshwater/ocean use changed that is sustainably managed by ecosystem type and business activity in the relevant time period (proportion of total, change from previous year) | SA 2.0 | Additional | Percentage of agricultural land under regenerative practices or of commodities sourced from farms implementing regenerative agricultural practices | GBF target 10 | |
SA 2.1 | Additional | Percentage of agricultural products sourced that are certified to a third-party environmental and/or social standard, and percentages by standard | SASB Agricultural products, FB-AG-430a.1 | |||
SA 2.2 | Additional | Percentage of cropland owned, leased, operated and/or sourced from with at least 10%, and ideally more than 20%, of natural vegetation per 1kmx1km/cultivated area | GBF Target 10 complementary indicator; UNSTAT, 2022; Nature, 2021) | |||
SA 2.3 | Additional | Crop breed diversity in production area which is owned, leased, operated or sourced from (ha physical area) | ADBI, draft monitoring framework of the GBF | |||
Impact drivers | Pollution/ pollution removal | Total pollutants released to soil split by type | SA 3.0 | Additional | Nitrogen use intensity (kg N output per kg N input) (as proportion of the total cropland area owned, leased managed or sourced from by the entity), differentiated by crop, animal-crop and food system uses, and disclosure of methodology used to calculate N use efficiency (Farm, watershed, national and global) | Adapted based on Zhang 2020, Li and Zhang (2022) from ADBI 2022 Agrobiodiversity Index |
Impact drivers | Pollution/ pollution removal | Volume of water discharged (total, freshwater, other) | SA 3.1.0 | Additional | Volume of water discharged (total, freshwater, other) per crop and/or product dry matter and/or animal protein | TNFD |
SA 3.1.1 | Additional | Volume of wastewater discharged to the environment from 1) crop product processing facilities and/or 2) animal processing facilities and volume of wastewater reused | Adapted from SASB Agricultural Products, 2018 | |||
Impact drivers | Pollution/ pollution removal | Concentrations of key pollutants in the wastewater discharged | SA 3.2.0 | Additional | Water pollutant loading rate (kg pollutant per month), including locally developed model results for pollutants from non-point source, based on average N and P nutrient loads over past 5 years of operations | SBTN Freshwater SBT’s 2022 |
N/A | SA 3.3.0 | Additional | Percentage of food loss and/or waste (%) as total food produced/handled and percentage diverted (%) | Adapted SASB Restaurants, 2018 | ||
SA 3.3.1 | Additional | Total weight of food loss and/or waste (metric tonnes) and the food loss percentage (%), by the organisation’s main products or product categories | Adapted from GRI, 2022; WRAP, 2022 | |||
SA 3.3.2 | Additional | Total nutritional density of food waste and/or food loss (in calories) | CEC, 2019 | |||
Impact drivers | Pollution/ pollution removal | Volume of plastic produced / consumed | SA 3.4.0 | Additional | Total weight (metric tonnes) of non-plastic packaging (primary, secondary and tertiary packaging) for food products by entity by packaging type | Adapted from SASB: Processed Foods, 2018 |
SA 3.4.1 | Additional | (1) Percentage total of sourced and purchased non-plastic packaging made from recycled materials, 2) Percentage total of sourced and purchased packaging made from renewable materials, 3) Percentage total of sourced and purchased packaging made from compostable materials and 4) For each material used those which are recycled, reused and composted, according to local laws and regulations | Adapted from SASB Processed food, 2018 | |||
Impact drivers | Pollution/ pollution removal | Pollutants removed from land, atmosphere, ocean and freshwater | SA 3.5 | Additional | Avoided pesticide use per hectare (as proportion of the total cropland area owned, leased managed or sourced from by the entity) by pesticide toxicity level (either extremely hazardous, highly hazardous, moderately hazardous, slightly hazardous, or unlikely to present an acute hazard). | Adapted from GRI 13; WHO |
Impact drivers | Resource use/ replenishment | Total water withdrawal and consumption from areas of water stress | SA 4.0 | Additional | Volume of water used (total, freshwater, other) from areas of water stress to produce a kg of crop and/or product dry matter and/or animal protein | TNFD |
Quantity and share of natural commodities sourced from priority ecosystems split into types (absolute, % of total, % change from previous year) | SA 4.1 | Additional | Amount of produced or sourced commodity volumes and proportion (%) demonstrated as deforestation-free and/or conversion free | Adapted from CDP Forest questionnaire, F1.5a; Afi,2022 | ||
Impact drivers | Invasive species and other | N/A | SA 5.0 | Additional | Percentage of animal production or animal protein sourced that receives (1) medically important antibiotics and (2) not medically important antibiotics, by animal type | SASB: Meat, Dairy and Poultry 2018 |
Changes to the state of nature | Ecosystem condition and extent | Quantitative measurement of change to ecosystem condition and extent in priority locations the organisation depends or impacts on | SA 6.0 | Additional | Proportion of land with soil degradation in the total area of agricultural production, including soil erosion, reduction in soil fertility, salinization of irrigated lands and waterlogging | FAO, 2021 |
SA 6.1 | Additional | Trends in the amount of litter in the water column including microplastics and on the seafloor | GBF draft monitoring framework, 2022 | |||
SA 6.2 | Additional | Coastal and freshwater eutrophication; plastic debris density: 1) Chlorophyll-A concentration 2) In-situ concentration of nitrogen, phosphate and silica | GBF draft monitoring framework, 2022 | |||
SA 6.3 | Additional | Name, amount/volume/concentration pesticides by location (per land/marine area sensitivity), weighted by toxicity levels (1, 8, 16 and 64 for low-risk, “normal”, more hazardous and non-approved substances) (Adapted from GBF monitoring framework, 2022) | UN WCMC 2021 | |||
SA 6.4 | Additional | Volume per month (Ml/month) of discharge flow and mass of nutrients per volume (mg P/l) | SBTN, 2022 | |||
SA 6.5 | Additional | Changes in soil organic carbon stocks (over 5+ years relative to a baseline) | GBF draft monitoring framework, 2022 | |||
SA 6.6 | Additional | Species threat, abatement and restoration (STAR) | IUCN, Mair et al 2021) | |||
SA 6.7 | Additional | Local species population indexes (e.g. farmland bird index) | OP2B | |||
SA 6.8 | Additional | Diversity of pollinators and natural predators of livestock and cropland pests | ADBI, 2022 | |||
SA 6.9 | Additional | Red List Index | GBF draft monitoring framework, 2022 |
Footnotes
When disclosing on ecosystem types, refer to the IUCN classification of ecosystem typology
Metrics Annex 5: Disclosure metrics for the tropical forest biome
Organisations interfacing with nature in the tropical forest biome should consider disclosing the following metrics for disclosure recommendation Metrics and Targets B and Strategy A. All metrics are additional.
Additional ContentQuantitative additional disclosure metrics for the tropical forest biome
Metrics category | Driver of nature change | Cross-sector indicator | Metrics no. | Metrics for tropical forests biome | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Impact drivers | Land/ freshwater/ocean-use change | Extent of land/ freshwater/ ocean use change, by type of ecosystem[1] (before and after change) and business activity, for prioritised ecosystems | BA 2.0 | Natural forest cover loss within areas of direction operational control. This should include a description of methods and tools used to assess natural forest cover loss. | TNFD |
BA 2.1 | Landscape-level or country-ecoregion-level natural forest cover loss within areas of indirect operational control (i.e. sourcing locations) | TNFD | |||
BA 2.2 | Spatial overlap (ha) of business activities with deforestation hotspots | TNFD | |||
Ecosystem condition and extent | N/A | Quantitative measurement of change to ecosystem condition and extent in priority locations the organization depends or impacts on | BA 6.0 | Ecosystem condition as measured by Mean Species Abundance (MSA) (adjusted for management in case of forest-based activities such as logging) | Schipper et al. 2020 https://www.globio.info/what-is-globio |
BA 6.1 | Maximum STAR-t (Species Threat Abatement and Restoration metric) | Mair et al. 2021 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-021-01432-0 |
|||
BA 6.2 | Forest Landscape Integrity Index (in sourcing locations or areas under direct operational control for forest-based enterprises such as logging) | Grantham et al. 2020 https://www.forestintegrity.com/ |
Footnotes
When disclosing on ecosystem types, refer to the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology: https://global-ecosystems.org/